dominoExperts.com - Powered by Domino 8.5.2
||Domino Accelerator Pack
- DAP know which URLs slow down your site. Do you?
Lotus Triple Search
DominoExperts + Blogs + R8 forum
|dominoExperts.com -> Trouble shooter
WebService stopped working after upgrade...
|Joacim Boive||Post date: 2007-07-04 12:31|
I have a WebService set up that returns an array as VARIANTARRAY_HOLDER.
All other services, that doesn't return an array, are still working flawlessly.
I don't get any error messages anywhere. What I do get back is this:
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
<ns1:GETLISTResponse soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:ns1="urn:DefaultNamespace">
<GETLISTReturn xsi:type="soapenc:Array" soapenc:arrayType="xsd:anyType">
<item xsi:type=":ENTRY"/> <- This should contain values
On a 7.0.1 server Item Entry type contains values, as it should.
I verified this by having two servers on the same computer and an identical database in both servers.
7.0.1 returns the values and 7.0.2FP2 does not!
I'm stumped! Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
|Tomas Nielsen||Post date: 2007-07-05 13:10|
Can you post the web service here or is it entangled in the customers environment?
I could test it on Domino 8 for you but I am not sure if it would help you.
|Joacim Boive||Post date: 2007-07-05 13:23|
Here's all of the code. But the function causing my headache is getList of Class wsInfo.
I've also tried changing the SOAP message format, to no avail...
|Joacim Boive||Post date: 2007-07-06 10:15|
I've opened a PMR with Lotus, we'll say what it emitts to.
|Tomas Nielsen||Post date: 2007-07-06 23:28|
I must say I have good experiences from Lotus support. Most of the time I have gotten an answer that either solved the problem or at least explained it.
Keep us posted!
|Joacim Boive||Post date: 2007-09-20 09:03|
Sorry for the delay...
Yep, they confirmed all my findings. They're currently working at a hotfix for the bug...
Subscribe to Forum
Share this page